Pacific Flyer Magazine

Home  >  Aviation Articles  >  Forced Landing

Forced Landing
by Gary Wiblin

From Pacific Flyer Magazine,
April 2006 Edition


We were flying a C 152 at 3,000' agl in our local general flying area. It was a beautiful day and for a change the wind wasn't blowing in the "windy city". So far the PPL renewal had gone fantastically and the applicant and myself were in high spirits. There is nothing like a flawless flight test to brighten my day. It was now time for the "simulated engine failure" part of the test and I reached out and slowly reduced power to idle. The pilot, let us call him Peter, sprang into action and began running through a carefully rehearsed procedure. He converted the excess speed into height and trimmed, he quickly ran through the immediate action drills of checking that the mixture was set correctly, the fuel was correctly set to "both" and he applied the carburetor heat. He then chose a nearby airfield as his landing site and continued with fault finding, passenger briefing, and a Mayday call. So far so good.

It was as we started turning onto final approach that things began to go wrong. We were a bit high so he selected 10û of flap. Looking good. We were still a bit on the high side so he selected another notch of flap, giving us 20û. Bang on! As we approached short final he selected the last notch of flap, giving us the full 30û. For a moment it looked as though we might get away with it but then it became obvious that we were going to under-shoot. Peter began to raise the nose of the aircraft to try and stretch the glide, with disastrous results. The aircraft just began to sink even more quickly and when it became obvious that there was no way we were going to make the field, I asked him to apply full power and initiate the go-around.

This was going to be such a magnificent example of a simulated forced landing that I was genuinely disappointed when it didn't work out. How could Peter have saved the day here? Easy! After selecting full flap, when it became obvious that we were not going to make the field, all he had to do was retract the flap to 20û, simultaneously raising the nose of the aircraft in order to maintain the correct glide speed. Bearing in mind that changing the flap selection from 20û to 30û increases the drag significantly but makes very little difference to the lift produced by the wing, it can be appreciated that in the foregoing scenario reducing the flap setting by one notch would probably have made the difference we were looking for. Now before I hear howls of protest allow me to explain.

I am well aware that most training manuals advise against retracting the flap, even by 10û, when near to the ground. There is good reason for this. Even when reducing the flap setting from 30û to 20û there will initially be some loss of lift and you will briefly get that sinking feeling. However, it will be very brief, and in the foregoing scenario it would almost certainly have saved the day. With larger aircraft that have more inertia you have to be a bit more careful as they take a bit longer to stabilise into a newly selected configuration, but in an aircraft as light as a C 152 this is not one of our concerns. I have found that on a blustery day when the wind speed is constantly varying from 10 kts to 25 kts, I am able to fly a constant angle of approach by constantly adjusting the flap setting to suit the rate of descent that I require. If the aircraft is sinking too fast, raise the flap in stages whilst simultaneously raising the nose of the aircraft to maintain the correct speed. If the wind speed suddenly increases and the rate of descent not only reduces but, in fact, the aircraft starts climbing, then open the barn doors, i.e. throw out all the flap that you have. Immediately. This is where the old C 150's were great with their 40û of flap. After selecting 40û of flap all you had to do was look straight down for your landing site. I have often wondered why Cessna ever did away with those useful 40û. Something to do with the go-around not always going as planned, I believe.
The same mind-set can also be successfully used when turning onto final approach and you find that you are way too high. Even if you already have full flap, do something. I have often watched pilots sit there on final approach with full flap, being way too high, and just do nothing. If it were a real forced landing it appears that they would just be resigned to their fate. Try breaking off the final approach and repositioning. Try S-turns. Try sideslipping. I even sometimes jokingly tell people to try a loop if they have to. My point though is "do something".

Remember too, that before touchdown it would be a good idea to switch off the fuel and the master. Just be sure though that you have finished selecting flap as required before finally shutting off the master. You will need the electrical circuits to be operational in order to operate the flaps.

If the propeller is standing still and you have a whole lot of unwelcome silence in the cockpit, you have only one chance to put that aircraft down in a way that offers the least amount of danger to yourself and your passengers. Get some dual often. You owe it to your passengers.